This standard is issued under the fixed designation E; the 1 This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E50 on Environ-. On November 6th, , ASTM published the long anticipated new standard for conducting Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, ASTM E The ASTM E Standard is the industry standard used for Phase I Environmental Site Assessments. Fully named “ASTM E Standard Practice for.
|Published (Last):||3 June 2006|
|PDF File Size:||3.65 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.19 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
An Environmental Professional is someone with [ citation needed ]. For other uses, see Level 1 disambiguation and Phase 1 disambiguation. Phase II Environmental Site Assessment is an “intrusive” investigation which collects original samples of soil, groundwater or building materials to analyze for quantitative values of various contaminants.
Phase I environmental site assessment – Wikipedia
Sections 6 through 11 are the main body of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, including evaluation and report preparation. Performance of this practice is intended to reduce, but not eliminate, uncertainty regarding the potential for recognized environmental conditions in connection with a propertyand this practice recognizes reasonable limits e15527 time and cost.
The analysis, often called an ESAtypically addresses both the underlying land as well as physical improvements to the property. As such, sufficient documentation of all sources, records, and resources utilized in conducting the inquiry required by this practice must be ast in the written report refer asym 8. No specific legal relationship between the environmental professional and the user is necessary for the user to meet the requirements of this practice.
It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. The term recognized environmental conditions means the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products d1527 a property under conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release of any hazardous substances or petroleum s1527 into structures on the property or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property.
De minimis conditions are not recognized environmental conditions.
As such, sufficient documentation of all sources, records, and resources utilized in conducting the inquiry required by this practice must be provided in the written report refer to 7. Controlled substances are not included within the scope of this standard. When the field visit component is deleted the study is sometimes called a Transaction Screen. In Japan, with the passage of the Soil Contamination Countermeasures Lawthere is a strong movement to conduct Phase I studies more routinely.
Section of this practice identifies, for informational purposes, certain environmental conditions not an all-inclusive list that may exist on a property that are beyond the scope of this practice but may warrant consideration by parties to a commercial real estate transaction.
In most cases, the public file searches, historical research and chain-of-title examinations are outsourced to information services that specialize in such activities. Link to Active This link will always route to the current Active version of the standard. Nevertheless, this practice is intended to reflect a commercially prudent and reasonable inquiry. The appendixes are included for information and are not part of the procedures prescribed in this practice.
The term recognized environmental conditions means the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products on a property under conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures on the property or into the ground, ground water, or surface water of the property.
In the United States, an environmental site assessment is a report prepared for a real estate holding that identifies potential or existing environmental contamination liabilities.
Not all aspects of this practice may be applicable in all circumstances. The Phase I ESA is generally considered the first step in the process of environmental due diligence. In the United Kingdom contaminated land regulation is outlined in the Environment Act Section 3 is Referenced Documents. The named reference ben-engineering.
Such additional services may include business environmental risk issues not included within the scope of this practice, examples of which are identified in Section 13 under Non-Scope Considerations.
There is a point at which the cost of information obtained or the time required to gather it outweighs the usefulness of the information and, in fact, may be a material detriment to the orderly completion of transactions.
Depending upon precise protocols utilized, there are a number of variations in the scope of a Phase I study. Section 3Terminology, has definitions of terms not unique to this practice, descriptions of terms unique to this practice, and acronyms. This study normally involves assessment of alternative cleanup methods, costs and logistics.
Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Most site assessments are conducted by private companies independent of the owner or potential purchaser of the land.
One of the purposes of this axtm is to identify a balance between the competing goals of limiting the costs and time demands inherent in performing an environmental site assessment and the reduction of uncertainty about unknown conditions resulting from additional information. Section 5 provides discussion regarding activity and use limitations. This ASTM standard is not intended to represent or replace the standard ast, care by which the adequacy of a given professional service must be judged, nor should this document be applied without consideration of a project’s many unique aspects.
In addition, no implication is intended that it is currently customary practice for environmental site assessments to be conducted in other unenumerated instances including but not limited to many commercial leasing transactions, many acquisitions of easements, and many loan transactions in which the lender has multiple remedies. Thus, ast transactions are not included in the adtm commercial real estate transactions, and it is not intended to imply that such persons are obligated to conduct an environmental site assessment in connection with these transactions for purposes of all appropriate inquiries or for any other purpose.
While there are myriad sites that have been analyzed to date within the United States, the following list will serve as examples of the subject matter:. Inclusion of petroleum products within the scope of this practice is not based upon the applicability, if any, of CERCLA to petroleum products. Phase III investigations may involve intensive testing, sampling, and monitoring, “fate and transport” studies and other modeling, and the design of feasibility studies for remediation and remedial plans.
The appendixes are included for information and are not part of the procedures prescribed in this practice. Both are environmental site assessments for commercial real estate. Often a multi-disciplinary approach is taken in compiling all the components of a Phase I study, since skills in chemistryatmospheric physicsgeologymicrobiology and even botany are frequently required.
As such, sufficient documentation of all sources, records, and resources utilized in conducting the inquiry required by this practice must be provided in the written report refer to 8.
Section 2 is Referenced Documents.
Phase I environmental site assessment
Many of the preparers are environmental scientists who have been trained to integrate these diverse disciplines. Retrieved from ” https: Some parts of Europe began to conduct Phase I studies on selected properties in the s, but still lack the comprehensive attention given to virtually awtm major real estate transactions in the USA.
Subsequent environmental site assessments should not be considered valid standards to judge the appropriateness of any prior assessment based on hindsight, new information, use of developing technology or analytical techniques, or other factors.